1. Invitado, ven y descarga gratuitamente el cuarto número de nuestra revista literaria digital "Eco y Latido"

    !!!Te va a encantar, no te la pierdas!!!

    Cerrar notificación

Open relationships

Tema en 'Prosa: Torre de Babel de Prosa' comenzado por Luis Rubio, 15 de Diciembre de 2019. Respuestas: 2 | Visitas: 657

  1. Luis Rubio

    Luis Rubio Moderador ENSEÑANTE/Asesor en Foro Poética Clásica Miembro del Equipo Moderadores Moderador enseñante

    Se incorporó:
    22 de Junio de 2019
    Mensajes:
    2.737
    Me gusta recibidos:
    2.605
    Género:
    Hombre


    Can we have the cake and eat it too? Loyalty is no longer the cornerstone of modern relationships. Conjugal faithfulness is probably one of the most overrated virtues, given that science doesn’t back monogamy.


    Morality represents the way that people would like the world to work. Nevertheless, if we turn our eyes to Nature, this will provide some awesome examples about how sexual behaviour actually does work.


    One of the most well-known theories about the connection between sexual arousal and polygamy is the Coolidge effect. The Coolidge effect is the fact that a copulating male who becomes incapable of continuing to copulate with one sex partner can often recommence copulating with a new companion.


    We don’t know if the effect is extensible to the other gender. However, we cannot blame anyone for the fact that the Coolidge effect has not been demonstrated in females because it is more difficult to conduct well-controlled Coolidge-effect experiments with females.

    The Coolidge effect is named after President Calvin Coolidge, of whom the following story is told. The anecdote is probably false, although it shouldn’t be.


    According to rumours, during a tour in a massive poultry farm, Mrs. Coolidge inquired of the farmer how his grange managed to produce so many eggs with such a small number of roosters. The countryman proudly explained than his roosters performed their duty dozens of times each day. The First Lady replayed in a loudly sharp voice if he could mention that to Mr. Coolidge.

    The President, overhearing the comment, asked the farmer if each rooster did service the same hen every time. The farmer replied that there were many hens for each rooster, forcing the President to beg the farmer if he could possibly share that with Mrs. Coolidge.


    The conventional wisdom is often wrong. It looks like if we want to make a virtue of necessity, we ought to admit that open relationships are not only inevitable but convenient. Conventional wisdom is often shoddily formed and devilishly difficult to see through, but it can be done. We all agree that once the cake is eaten, it is gone, but, does it matter in such a big cake market?


    A legion of poultry of this kind can’t be wrong, can’t they?
     
    #1
    Última modificación: 17 de Diciembre de 2019
    A Guadalupe Cisneros-Villa y Solaribus les gusta esto.
  2. Guadalupe Cisneros-Villa

    Guadalupe Cisneros-Villa Dallas, Texas y Monterrey NL México

    Se incorporó:
    8 de Octubre de 2007
    Mensajes:
    16.600
    Me gusta recibidos:
    9.830
    Género:
    Mujer
    Perhaps not, however we eat chickens...;)

    By the way HAPPY BIRTHDAY!! hope you had lots of cake...:)
     
    #2
    A Luis Rubio le gusta esto.
  3. Solaribus

    Solaribus Poeta veterano en el portal

    Se incorporó:
    25 de Mayo de 2010
    Mensajes:
    1.924
    Me gusta recibidos:
    1.346
    Género:
    Hombre
    Perhaps the experience has difficult results to compare in women, because we intend to rise above the Animal Kingdom.
    Congrats! Hahaha!

    My wife

    Congrats! Solaribus.
     
    #3
    Última modificación: 7 de Marzo de 2020

Comparte esta página